Gore is an exception which proves the rule in that it took quite awhile for Gore to rehabilitate himself and I note he did it with a scathing anti-war partisan attack on Bush.

Even taking it with the requisite grain of salt, I guess it's fair to say they don't like each other.

1.  New Hampshire who?

2.  3 Million person email database.

3.  Shows that Obama is 'safe' and has enough experience to handle the job.

Please drop the "I'm neutral" pose.  You're in the tank for Hillary. Fine.

For you, there are two categories of possible Obama endorsers: the Johnsons, whose endorsement actually repels you, and those like Kerry, whose endorsement to you seems irrelevant.

Fine. Any Obama endorsement by any Dem, can, for you, only be bad or irrelevant.

Like him, I also lived abroad as a young man, and I share with him a healthy respect for the advantage of knowing other cultures and countries, not from a book or a briefing, but by personal experience, by gut, by instinct.

Dear Lord.  Isn't that how W governs, from his gut?  I don't blame Obama for this, I blame Kerry.  Your guy's being called an empty suit and you put this in your endorsement?  Idiot.  

And I know that's not all of what Kerry said, but seriously, can no one - not even his Senate colleagues - praise him for his substantive knowledge or, you know, something he's DONE.  We're still talking about his childhood overseas?  If he somehow gets out of the primary, the lines about his childhood are going to be used relentlessly in the general election, especially if McCain is the nominee.  How can the Obama camp not see that?  I'm not an Obama supporter, but I find it hard to believe that's the best they have to counter Clinton's experience argument.