home

Bush Admits U.S. Used British Territory During Transport of Ghost Prisoners

The Bush Administration has admitted for the first time using a British territory in its transporting of Ghost Air prisoners as part of its secret rendition program.

The Bush administration is bracing for a diplomatic backlash after conceding it used British territory to transport suspected terrorists on secret rendition flights despite repeated earlier assurances the U.S. had not.

U.S. officials have sought to quell the fallout by apologizing to Britain for what they said was an "administrative error." The admission, however, may reopen a bitter debate between the United States and its allies over how the fight against terrorism should be conducted and compromise future cooperation.

The territory at issue: Diego Garcia.[More...]

CIA Director Michael Hayden acknowledged Thursday that two rendition flights carrying suspected terrorists did refuel at a U.S. naval base on Diego Garcia, despite what the agency had earlier maintained.

Condoleeza Rice in 2005:

"We have obligations under our international conventions and we are respecting the sovereignty of our allies," she told Sky News. "We are not using the airspace or the airports of any of our partners for activities that would lead renditions to torture. We don't send people to be tortured."

Human Rights Watch is asking Britain to conduct an investigation:

"It's high time the agency is held accountable," said Julia Hall of Human Rights Watch. She also sought an investigation into the British role in the program. "The U.S. flew hundreds of flights across Europe so the only way to have full accountability is for (Britain) to launch a thorough, national investigation."

What about the 74 landings in Canada? The probe by Spain? The alleged use of Poland and Romania? What about Germany and Italy?

Background on Ghost Air is here. Also check out Amnesty International's report on them..

< Bush Judicial Nominee: Private Prison Executive With Little Court Experience | Times' Keller Defends McCain "Story" >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Thanks for bringing this up. It is sad to see (none / 0) (#1)
    by my opinion on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 03:44:02 PM EST
    what has been done to our country by the Republicans, the corporate press and compliant Democrats. When I was young I used to wonder how could a country become morally reprehensible without the people stopping it, despite what I had read in books about how easy it really is. Now that we have lived through such a change I understand.

    A "diplomatic backlash"? (none / 0) (#2)
    by kmblue on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 03:50:51 PM EST
    How about a backlash from within our own borders?
    Oh, wait...

    That's OK (none / 0) (#3)
    by white n az on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 04:28:14 PM EST
    we never torture anyway

    Perhaps we should also (none / 0) (#4)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 10:48:16 PM EST
    apologize for the Lend Lease program and for using the British Isles as a staging area for the invasion of Europe.

    "Administrative Error" (none / 0) (#5)
    by john horse on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 06:04:08 AM EST
    The Bush administration . . . concede(ded)it used British territory to transport suspected terrorists on secret rendition flights despite repeated earlier assurances the U.S. had not.

    U.S. officials have sought to quell the fallout by apologizing to Britain for what they said was an "administrative error."

    What is the difference between lying and making an "administrative error"?