And if they're importing Muslems at a rate that is so low that it insures the end of western culture, then it's time for a more liberal government.

I fully agree with you that there should be vastly increased immigration from Muslim countries.

Particularly from Iraq, since of the more than 2 million Iraqi refugees created by the invasion and occupation of Iraq by the same incompetent government that is, in your view, importing Muslems at a rate that is so low that it insures the end of western culture, only 800 have been allowed to emigrate to the U.S.

You definitely gotta wonder why they are so scared of people who are so ecstatic at being liberated, dontcha?

I warned you not to used your own product if you're trying to sell it, ppj. It'll do you in everytime.

But would you listen? Noooooooooooooooooo...

......

In psychology, psychological projection (or projection bias) is a defense mechanism in which one attributes to others one's own unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions

You know, the one about General Betray-Us?

Because, um, he LIED--just like ABC did?

THAT is acceptable but this was not?

In 1999, St. Martin's Press published a book by author James H. Hatfield called Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President. The book, which contained allegations that then-candidate George W. Bush had used cocaine in the 1970s, received barely any media coverage -- until Hatfield's own past came into question, at which point Hatfield, not the allegations in his book, became the media's primary discussion topic during the story's short life.

While the media virtually ignored Fortunate Son (other than to condemn the book and its author), the Bush campaign was quick to threaten legal action, and many in the media suggested the press had a responsibility to either ignore the book altogether or to debunk its claims. When St. Martin's eventually suspended publication and recalled the book, the Bush campaign lauded the decision as "the right thing to do."

Media Matters

And congress was not trying to make law, so I'm not sure what you're getting at. Are you telling me that if a senator doesn't like something they read in the paper, they can't write an LTE asking that it be retracted, because they have so much power that could be perceived as pressure? Because if you are, then what you're actually doing is forcing senators to not exercize THEIR constitutional rights to free speech. That's what some people might call censorship, smart guy.

Works both ways, eh?

Be careful what you wish for, it just might come back to bite you.