Whenever someone intelligent comes on, he changes the channel.

Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez explained that the Bush administration's Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes" but did "file a civil action on January 7th, 2009."

Link.

Similarly, the Bush administration decided not to prosecute a Minuteman militia member for carrying a gun outside a polling station and questioning Hispanic voters:

Perez testified that in 2006, the Justice Department "declined to bring any action for alleged voter intimidation" "when three well-known anti-immigrant advocates affiliated with the Minutemen, one of whom was carrying a gun, allegedly intimidated Latino voters at a polling place by approaching several persons, filming them, and advocating and printing voting materials in Spanish."

Re: Shabazz, the Bush DOJ did file a civil action against him, and the Obama DOJ got a default judgment against him.

because Canada allows people to vote without ID's so long as someone verifies they are who they say they are.

from the article

"

The sellers in this situation would come to me and ask how much was I paying for votes, and ask me if I was buying votes or whatever, and I told them the most I could pay is $25," Salyers described to Fox News. "They would go into the machine and cast their vote...They were supposed to vote for me. They would come back to me and I would pay them for going to vote.  I had one gentleman come to me and say 'Mike, I have four votes,' so he took them to vote and I gave him $100, $25 a vote."

States with mechanical counting systems expected that numerous tabulation errors would occur, They also correctly predicted that these failures would not be 100% recoverable by any means even with hand recounts.

The loss was considered acceptable based on the theory that the errors would be proportional to he actual votes. In other words each candidate would bear the burden of negative errors in a ratio to their actual votes and the election results would be unaffected. This may or may not have been the case, but obviously the courts upheld the mechanical systems even though they guaranteed that not all the votes would be counted.

To say that provisional ballots are improper because ( in the case of uncontroverted decided elections ) the vote may not be counted ignores this precedent.

The political effort is subservient to the  constitutional and statutory laws that frame an election. The law is the law. It can be changed if needed.